(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-30 01:53 pm (UTC)
*AHEM* Back on topic: I don't think it's anything that sinister. In the case of an FCC investigation, ABC would most likely get fined, they would force JK's writers/publicist to issue a public retraction/apology and the censors would be sacked. The reason that Howard and that other DJ were responded to with such heavy-handedness is that they are regarded as "loose cannons" by the powers that be since they aren't subject to any sort of censorship or even arbitrary "age-appropriate programming hours" that the TV companies have imposed on themselves. Were "shock jocks" to self-edit or broadcast at "adult-content appropriate" times, they would have little trouble with any regulatory agency. Conversely, they would get a fraction of the attention they do now and there would be little interest in listening to their bleep-heavy content. Go figure.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

hellziggy: (Default)
hellziggy

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
567 89 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags