(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-04 10:55 pm (UTC)
They didn't have to make the decision, it was made for them.

When a person at the Zoo is bit by an animal that has the potential to carry rabies, the Zoo has two
options: 1. The person who is bit goes through the rabies vaccination series; or 2. If they are not able or willing to take the series, the Department of Public Health then mandates that the Zoo must euthanize the animal and test for rabies. The only way to test for rabies is via necropsy in the brain.

So the negligent parents were the ones that decided that 5 animals should be put to death rather than making their child who was clearly at fault get five shots in the arm.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

hellziggy: (Default)
hellziggy

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
567 89 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags